News and Comments about Life
Intense asteroid bombardment some 4 billion years ago may have possibily provided a boost for life.
Till recently it was believed the asteroids, some the size of Kansas, had sterilized the early Earth, causing one of the five mass extinction in our planet’s history. A new NASA-funded study indicates they might have pushed the other way.
The study – carried on by Oleg Abramov and Stephen J. Mojzsis, astrobiologists at the University of Colorado’s Department of Geological Sciences – focused on the so-called Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB), a particularly cataclysmic occurrence. A real asteroids rain, occurring approximately 3.9 billion years ago and lasting 20 to 200 million years.
In a letter published in the May 21 issue of Nature magazine titled “Microbial Habitability of the Hadean Earth during the Late Heavy Bombardment,” the two researchers report on the results of a computer modeling project designed to study the heating of Earth by the bombardment.
Results from their project show that while the Late Heavy Bombardment might have generated enough heat to sterilize Earth’s surface, microbial life in subsurface and underwater environments almost certainly would have survived.
“Exactly when life originated on Earth is a hotly debated topic,” said Michael H. New, the astrobiology discipline scientist and manager of the Exobiology and Evolutionary Biology Program at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “These findings are significant because they indicate that if life had begun before the LHB or some time prior to 4 billion years ago, it could have survived in limited refuges and then expanded to fill our world.”
“Our new results point to the possibility life could have emerged about the same time that evidence for our planet’s oceans first appears,” said Mojzsis, principal investigator of the project.
A growing scientific consensus is that during our solar system’s formation, planetary bodies were pummeled by debris throughout the Late Heavy Bombardment. A visual record of the event is preserved in the form of the scarred face of our moon. On Earth, all traces of the bombardment appear to have been erased by rock recycling forces like weathering, volcanoes or other conditions that cause the crust to move or change.
Surface habitats for microbial life on early Earth would have been destroyed repeatedly by the bombardment. However, at the same time, impacts could have created subsurface habitats for life, such as extensive networks of cracks or even hydrothermal vents. Any existing microbial life on Earth could have found refuge in these habitats. If life had not yet emerged on Earth by the time of the bombardment, these new subsurface environments could have been the place where terrestrial life emerged.
“Even under the most extreme conditions we imposed on our model, the bombardment could not have sterilized Earth completely,” said Abramov, lead author of the paper. “Our results are in line with the scientific consensus that hyperthermophilic, or ‘heat-loving,’ microbes could have been the earliest life forms on Earth, or survivors from an even more ancient biosphere. The results also support the potential for the persistence of microbial biospheres on other planetary bodies whose surfaces were reworked by the bombardment, including Mars.”
NASA’s Astrobiology Program’s Exobiology and Evolutionary Biology Program and the NASA Astrobiology Institute at NASA’s Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif., through its support of NASA’s Postdoctoral Program, provided funding for this research. The Astrobiology Program supports research into the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life on Earth and the potential for life elsewhere.