EESC, a common framework and transparency in dealing with radioactive wastes

A common framework for the safe management of radioactive wastes and full transparency for all actions and decisions concerning this very sensitive issue.

This what the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) has urged the European Union to establish.

Following the European Commission’s draft directive on radioactive waste the EESC highlighted the fact that in addition to the very extensive stockpile of radioactive waste of varying grades the EU produces 280 cubic metres of highly radioactive waste and 3,600 tonnes of Heavy Metal from spent fuel each year. All materials which need be handled as carefully as possibile, in face of the extremely high danger they represent for public health.

Also, the EESC called for a full involvement of  the public in proposals to determine the long term future of these materials and urgent action must be taken to resolve issues which have been under discussion for fifty years.

Richard Adams (United Kingdom, Various Interests Group), the rapporteur of the opinion, insisted that each Member State needed to make its own choice about radioactive waste management but within the framework of International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines and subject to a transrent approach and international peer review.

The British MEP pointed out that dealing with the issues of radioactive waste is not the same as expressing support or disagreement with the use of nuclear power. “The reality is that tens of thousands of tonnes of nuclear waste is stored in different ways at many sites across Europe, all the intermediate and high level waste is held in what is regarded as temporary storage. Europe urgently needs a publicly debated and accepted management plan,” he added.

The EESC also recommends the directive makes specific reference to being complementary to the directive on hazardous waste, should strongly affirm that the producer of the radioactive waste pays for its disposal and welcomes the opportunity for member states to develop, by agreement, shared facilities. In the meanwhile, it would be sensible to work towards forms of energy generation that did not involve the production of substances that posed a threat to human life for many centuries.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s